1 \define{versionidfaq} \versionid $Id$
5 This FAQ is published on the PuTTY web site, and also provided as an
6 appendix in the manual.
8 \H{faq-intro} Introduction
10 \S{faq-what}{Question} What is PuTTY?
12 PuTTY is a client program for the SSH, Telnet and Rlogin network
15 These protocols are all used to run a remote session on a computer,
16 over a network. PuTTY implements the client end of that session: the
17 end at which the session is displayed, rather than the end at which
20 In really simple terms: you run PuTTY on a Windows machine, and tell
21 it to connect to (for example) a Unix machine. PuTTY opens a window.
22 Then, anything you type into that window is sent straight to the
23 Unix machine, and everything the Unix machine sends back is
24 displayed in the window. So you can work on the Unix machine as if
25 you were sitting at its console, while actually sitting somewhere
28 \H{faq-support} Features supported in PuTTY
30 In general, if you want to know if PuTTY supports a particular
31 feature, you should look for it on the
32 \W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/}{PuTTY web site}.
36 \W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/changes.html}{changes
37 page}, and see if you can find the feature on there. If a feature is
38 listed there, it's been implemented. If it's listed as a change made
39 \e{since} the latest version, it should be available in the
40 development snapshots, in which case testing will be very welcome.
43 \W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/}{Wishlist
44 page}, and see if you can find the feature there. If it's on there,
45 and not in the \q{Recently fixed} section, it probably \e{hasn't} been
48 \S{faq-ssh2}{Question} Does PuTTY support SSH v2?
50 Yes. SSH v2 support has been available in PuTTY since version 0.50.
52 Public key authentication (both RSA and DSA) in SSH v2 is new in
55 \S{faq-ssh2-keyfmt}{Question} Does PuTTY support reading OpenSSH or
56 \cw{ssh.com} SSHv2 private key files?
58 PuTTY doesn't support this natively, but as of 0.53
59 PuTTYgen can convert both OpenSSH and \cw{ssh.com} private key
60 files into PuTTY's format.
62 \S{faq-ssh1}{Question} Does PuTTY support SSH v1?
64 Yes. SSH 1 support has always been available in PuTTY.
66 \S{faq-localecho}{Question} Does PuTTY support local echo?
68 Yes. Version 0.52 has proper support for local echo.
70 In version 0.51 and before, local echo could not be separated from
71 local line editing (where you type a line of text locally, and it is
72 not sent to the server until you press Return, so you have the
73 chance to edit it and correct mistakes \e{before} the server sees
74 it). New in version 0.52, local echo and local line editing are
75 separate options, and by default PuTTY will try to determine
76 automatically whether to enable them or not, based on which protocol
77 you have selected and also based on hints from the server. If you
78 have a problem with PuTTY's default choice, you can force each
79 option to be enabled or disabled as you choose. The controls are in
80 the Terminal panel, in the section marked \q{Line discipline
83 \S{faq-savedsettings}{Question} Does PuTTY support storing settings,
84 so I don't have to change them every time?
86 Yes, all of PuTTY's settings can be saved in named session profiles.
87 See \k{config-saving} in the documentation for how to do this.
89 \S{faq-disksettings}{Question} Does PuTTY support storing its
90 settings in a disk file?
92 Not at present, although \k{config-file} in the documentation gives
93 a method of achieving the same effect.
95 \S{faq-fullscreen}{Question} Does PuTTY support full-screen mode,
98 Yes; this is a new feature in version 0.52.
100 \S{faq-password-remember}{Question} Does PuTTY have the ability to
101 remember my password so I don't have to type it every time?
105 Remembering your password is a bad plan for obvious security
106 reasons: anyone who gains access to your machine while you're away
107 from your desk can find out the remembered password, and use it,
108 abuse it or change it.
110 In addition, it's not even \e{possible} for PuTTY to automatically
111 send your password in a Telnet session, because Telnet doesn't give
112 the client software any indication of which part of the login
113 process is the password prompt. PuTTY would have to guess, by
114 looking for words like \q{password} in the session data; and if your
115 login program is written in something other than English, this won't
118 In SSH, remembering your password would be possible in theory, but
119 there doesn't seem to be much point since SSH supports public key
120 authentication, which is more flexible and more secure. See
121 \k{pubkey} in the documentation for a full discussion of public key
124 \S{faq-hostkeys}{Question} Is there an option to turn off the
125 annoying host key prompts?
127 No, there isn't. And there won't be. Even if you write it yourself
128 and send us the patch, we won't accept it.
130 Those annoying host key prompts are the \e{whole point} of SSH.
131 Without them, all the cryptographic technology SSH uses to secure
132 your session is doing nothing more than making an attacker's job
133 slightly harder; instead of sitting between you and the server with
134 a packet sniffer, the attacker must actually subvert a router and
135 start modifying the packets going back and forth. But that's not all
136 that much harder than just sniffing; and without host key checking,
137 it will go completely undetected by client or server.
139 Host key checking is your guarantee that the encryption you put on
140 your data at the client end is the \e{same} encryption taken off the
141 data at the server end; it's your guarantee that it hasn't been
142 removed and replaced somewhere on the way. Host key checking makes
143 the attacker's job \e{astronomically} hard, compared to packet
144 sniffing, and even compared to subverting a router. Instead of
145 applying a little intelligence and keeping an eye on Bugtraq, the
146 attacker must now perform a brute-force attack against at least one
147 military-strength cipher. That insignificant host key prompt really
148 does make \e{that} much difference.
150 If you're having a specific problem with host key checking - perhaps
151 you want an automated batch job to make use of PSCP or Plink, and
152 the interactive host key prompt is hanging the batch process - then
153 the right way to fix it is to add the correct host key to the
154 Registry in advance. That way, you retain the \e{important} feature
155 of host key checking: the right key will be accepted and the wrong
156 ones will not. Adding an option to turn host key checking off
157 completely is the wrong solution and we will not do it.
159 If you have host keys available in the common \c{known_hosts} format,
160 we have a script called
161 \W{http://www.tartarus.org/~simon-anonsvn/viewcvs.cgi/putty/contrib/kh2reg.py?view=markup}\c{kh2reg.py}
162 to convert them to a Windows .REG file, which can be installed ahead of
163 time by double-clicking or using \c{REGEDIT}.
165 \S{faq-server}{Question} Will you write an SSH server for the PuTTY
166 suite, to go with the client?
168 No. The only reason we might want to would be if we could easily
169 re-use existing code and significantly cut down the effort. We don't
170 believe this is the case; there just isn't enough common ground
171 between an SSH client and server to make it worthwhile.
173 If someone else wants to use bits of PuTTY in the process of writing
174 a Windows SSH server, they'd be perfectly welcome to of course, but
175 I really can't see it being a lot less effort for us to do that than
176 it would be for us to write a server from the ground up. We don't
177 have time, and we don't have motivation. The code is available if
178 anyone else wants to try it.
180 \S{faq-pscp-ascii}{Question} Can PSCP or PSFTP transfer files in
185 Until recently, this was a limitation of the file transfer protocols:
186 the SCP and SFTP protocols had no notion of transferring a file in
187 anything other than binary mode. (This is still true of SCP.)
189 The current draft protocol spec of SFTP proposes a means of
190 implementing ASCII transfer. At some point PSCP/PSFTP may implement
193 \H{faq-ports} Ports to other operating systems
195 The eventual goal is for PuTTY to be a multi-platform program, able
196 to run on at least Windows, Mac OS and Unix.
198 Porting will become easier once PuTTY has a generalised porting
199 layer, drawing a clear line between platform-dependent and
200 platform-independent code. The general intention was for this
201 porting layer to evolve naturally as part of the process of doing
202 the first port; a Unix port has now been released and the plan
203 seems to be working so far.
205 \S{faq-ports-general}{Question} What ports of PuTTY exist?
207 Currently, release versions of PuTTY tools only run on full Win32
208 systems and Unix. \q{Win32} includes Windows 95, 98, and ME, and it
209 includes Windows NT, Windows 2000 and Windows XP.
211 In the development code, a partial port to the Mac OS (see
212 \k{faq-mac-port}) is under way.
214 Currently PuTTY does \e{not} run on Windows CE (see \k{faq-wince}),
215 and it does not quite run on the Win32s environment under Windows
216 3.1 (see \k{faq-win31}).
218 We do not have release-quality ports for any other systems at the
219 present time. If anyone told you we had an EPOC port, or an iPaq port,
220 or any other port of PuTTY, they were mistaken. We don't.
222 There are some third-party ports to various platforms, mentioned
223 on the Links page of our website.
225 \S{faq-unix}{Question} Is there a port to Unix?
227 As of 0.54, there are Unix ports of most of the traditional PuTTY
228 tools, and also one entirely new application.
230 If you look at the source release, you should find a \c{unix}
231 subdirectory containing \c{Makefile.gtk}, which should build you Unix
232 ports of Plink, PuTTY itself, PuTTYgen, PSCP, PSFTP, and also
233 \c{pterm} - an \cw{xterm}-type program which supports the same
234 terminal emulation as PuTTY. We do not yet have a Unix port of
237 If you don't have Gtk, you should still be able to build the
240 Note that Unix PuTTY has mostly only been tested on Linux so far;
241 portability problems such as BSD-style ptys or different header file
242 requirements are expected.
244 \S{faq-unix-why}{Question} What's the point of the Unix port? Unix
247 All sorts of little things. \c{pterm} is directly useful to anyone
248 who prefers PuTTY's terminal emulation to \c{xterm}'s, which at
249 least some people do. Unix Plink has apparently found a niche among
250 people who find the complexity of OpenSSL makes OpenSSH hard to
251 install (and who don't mind Plink not having as many features). Some
252 users want to generate a large number of SSH keys on Unix and then
253 copy them all into PuTTY, and the Unix PuTTYgen should allow them to
254 automate that conversion process.
256 There were development advantages as well; porting PuTTY to Unix was
257 a valuable path-finding effort for other future ports, and also
258 allowed us to use the excellent Linux tool
259 \W{http://valgrind.kde.org/}{Valgrind} to help with debugging, which
260 has already improved PuTTY's stability on \e{all} platforms.
262 However, if you're a Unix user and you can see no reason to switch
263 from OpenSSH to PuTTY/Plink, then you're probably right. We don't
264 expect our Unix port to be the right thing for everybody.
266 \S{faq-wince}{Question} Will there be a port to Windows CE or PocketPC?
268 It's currently being worked on, but it's only in its early stages yet,
269 and certainly isn't yet useful. PuTTY on portable devices would
270 clearly be a useful thing, so in the long term I hope it can be
271 brought up to release quality.
273 There's also a third-party port at
274 \W{http://pocketputty.duxy.net/}\c{http://pocketputty.duxy.net/}.
276 \S{faq-win31}{Question} Is there a port to Windows 3.1?
278 PuTTY is a 32-bit application from the ground up, so it won't run on
279 Windows 3.1 as a native 16-bit program; and it would be \e{very}
280 hard to port it to do so, because of Windows 3.1's vile memory
281 allocation mechanisms.
283 However, it is possible in theory to compile the existing PuTTY
284 source in such a way that it will run under Win32s (an extension to
285 Windows 3.1 to let you run 32-bit programs). In order to do this
286 you'll need the right kind of C compiler - modern versions of Visual
287 C at least have stopped being backwards compatible to Win32s. Also,
288 the last time we tried this it didn't work very well.
290 If you're interested in running PuTTY under Windows 3.1, help and
291 testing in this area would be very welcome!
293 \S{faq-mac-port}{Question} Will there be a port to the Mac?
295 There is a port to the Mac OS in progress. It's just about usable, but
296 has an awful lot of gaps and rough edges that will need cleaning up
297 before release (such as useful random numbers).
299 A separate port to Mac OS X is also underway.
301 \S{faq-epoc}{Question} Will there be a port to EPOC?
303 I hope so, but given that ports aren't really progressing very fast
304 even on systems the developers \e{do} already know how to program
305 for, it might be a long time before any of us get round to learning
306 a new system and doing the port for that.
308 However, some of the work has been done by other people, and a beta
309 port of PuTTY for the Nokia 9200 Communicator series is available
310 from \W{http://s2putty.sourceforge.net/}\cw{http://s2putty.sourceforge.net/}
312 \H{faq-embedding} Embedding PuTTY in other programs
314 \S{faq-dll}{Question} Is the SSH or Telnet code available as a DLL?
316 No, it isn't. It would take a reasonable amount of rewriting for
317 this to be possible, and since the PuTTY project itself doesn't
318 believe in DLLs (they make installation more error-prone) none of us
319 has taken the time to do it.
321 Most of the code cleanup work would be a good thing to happen in
322 general, so if anyone feels like helping, we wouldn't say no.
324 \S{faq-vb}{Question} Is the SSH or Telnet code available as a Visual
327 No, it isn't. None of the PuTTY team uses Visual Basic, and none of
328 us has any particular need to make SSH connections from a Visual
329 Basic application. In addition, all the preliminary work to turn it
330 into a DLL would be necessary first; and furthermore, we don't even
331 know how to write VB components.
333 If someone offers to do some of this work for us, we might consider
334 it, but unless that happens I can't see VB integration being
335 anywhere other than the very bottom of our priority list.
337 \S{faq-ipc}{Question} How can I use PuTTY to make an SSH connection
338 from within another program?
340 Probably your best bet is to use Plink, the command-line connection
341 tool. If you can start Plink as a second Windows process, and
342 arrange for your primary process to be able to send data to the
343 Plink process, and receive data from it, through pipes, then you
344 should be able to make SSH connections from your program.
346 This is what CVS for Windows does, for example.
348 \H{faq-details} Details of PuTTY's operation
350 \S{faq-term}{Question} What terminal type does PuTTY use?
352 For most purposes, PuTTY can be considered to be an \cw{xterm}
355 PuTTY also supports some terminal control sequences not supported by
356 the real \cw{xterm}: notably the Linux console sequences that
357 reconfigure the colour palette, and the title bar control sequences
358 used by \cw{DECterm} (which are different from the \cw{xterm} ones;
359 PuTTY supports both).
361 By default, PuTTY announces its terminal type to the server as
362 \c{xterm}. If you have a problem with this, you can reconfigure it
363 to say something else; \c{vt220} might help if you have trouble.
365 \S{faq-settings}{Question} Where does PuTTY store its data?
367 On Windows, PuTTY stores most of its data (saved sessions, SSH host
368 keys) in the Registry. The precise location is
370 \c HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SimonTatham\PuTTY
372 and within that area, saved sessions are stored under \c{Sessions}
373 while host keys are stored under \c{SshHostKeys}.
375 PuTTY also requires a random number seed file, to improve the
376 unpredictability of randomly chosen data needed as part of the SSH
377 cryptography. This is stored by default in your Windows home
378 directory (\c{%HOMEDRIVE%\\%HOMEPATH%}), or in the actual Windows
379 directory (such as \c{C:\\WINDOWS}) if the home directory doesn't
380 exist, for example if you're using Win95. If you want to change the
381 location of the random number seed file, you can put your chosen
382 pathname in the Registry, at
384 \c HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SimonTatham\PuTTY\RandSeedFile
386 On Unix, PuTTY stores all of this data in a directory \cw{~/.putty}.
388 \H{faq-howto} HOWTO questions
390 \S{faq-startmax}{Question} How can I make PuTTY start up maximised?
392 Create a Windows shortcut to start PuTTY from, and set it as \q{Run
395 \S{faq-startsess}{Question} How can I create a Windows shortcut to
396 start a particular saved session directly?
398 To run a PuTTY session saved under the name \q{\cw{mysession}},
399 create a Windows shortcut that invokes PuTTY with a command line
402 \c \path\name\to\putty.exe -load mysession
404 (Note: prior to 0.53, the syntax was \c{@session}. This is now
405 deprecated and may be removed at some point.)
407 \S{faq-startssh}{Question} How can I start an SSH session straight
408 from the command line?
410 Use the command line \c{putty -ssh host.name}. Alternatively, create
411 a saved session that specifies the SSH protocol, and start the saved
412 session as shown in \k{faq-startsess}.
414 \S{faq-cutpaste}{Question} How do I copy and paste between PuTTY and
415 other Windows applications?
417 Copy and paste works similarly to the X Window System. You use the
418 left mouse button to select text in the PuTTY window. The act of
419 selection \e{automatically} copies the text to the clipboard: there
420 is no need to press Ctrl-Ins or Ctrl-C or anything else. In fact,
421 pressing Ctrl-C will send a Ctrl-C character to the other end of
422 your connection (just like it does the rest of the time), which may
423 have unpleasant effects. The \e{only} thing you need to do, to copy
424 text to the clipboard, is to select it.
426 To paste the clipboard contents into a PuTTY window, by default you
427 click the right mouse button. If you have a three-button mouse and
428 are used to X applications, you can configure pasting to be done by
429 the middle button instead, but this is not the default because most
430 Windows users don't have a middle button at all.
432 You can also paste by pressing Shift-Ins.
434 \S{faq-options}{Question} How do I use all PuTTY's features (public
435 keys, proxying, cipher selection, etc.) in PSCP, PSFTP and Plink?
437 Most major features (e.g., public keys, port forwarding) are available
438 through command line options. See the documentation.
440 Not all features are accessible from the command line yet, although
441 we'd like to fix this. In the meantime, you can use most of
442 PuTTY's features if you create a PuTTY saved session, and then use
443 the name of the saved session on the command line in place of a
444 hostname. This works for PSCP, PSFTP and Plink (but don't expect
445 port forwarding in the file transfer applications!).
447 \S{faq-pscp}{Question} How do I use PSCP.EXE? When I double-click it
448 gives me a command prompt window which then closes instantly.
450 PSCP is a command-line application, not a GUI application. If you
451 run it without arguments, it will simply print a help message and
454 To use PSCP properly, run it from a Command Prompt window. See
455 \k{pscp} in the documentation for more details.
457 \S{faq-pscp-spaces}{Question} How do I use PSCP to copy a file whose
460 If PSCP is using the traditional SCP protocol, this is confusing. If
461 you're specifying a file at the local end, you just use one set of
462 quotes as you would normally do:
464 \c pscp "local filename with spaces" user@host:
465 \c pscp user@host:myfile "local filename with spaces"
467 But if the filename you're specifying is on the \e{remote} side, you
468 have to use backslashes and two sets of quotes:
470 \c pscp user@host:"\"remote filename with spaces\"" local_filename
471 \c pscp local_filename user@host:"\"remote filename with spaces\""
473 Worse still, in a remote-to-local copy you have to specify the local
474 file name explicitly, otherwise PSCP will complain that they don't
475 match (unless you specified the \c{-unsafe} option). The following
476 command will give an error message:
478 \c c:\>pscp user@host:"\"oo er\"" .
479 \c warning: remote host tried to write to a file called 'oo er'
480 \c when we requested a file called '"oo er"'.
482 Instead, you need to specify the local file name in full:
484 \c c:\>pscp user@host:"\"oo er\"" "oo er"
486 If PSCP is using the newer SFTP protocol, none of this is a problem,
487 and all filenames with spaces in are specified using a single pair
488 of quotes in the obvious way:
490 \c pscp "local file" user@host:
491 \c pscp user@host:"remote file" .
493 \H{faq-trouble} Troubleshooting
495 \S{faq-incorrect-mac}{Question} Why do I see \q{Incorrect MAC
498 One possible cause of this that used to be common is a bug in old
499 SSH 2 servers distributed by \cw{ssh.com}. (This is not the only
500 possible cause; see \k{errors-crc} in the documentation.)
501 Version 2.3.0 and below of their SSH 2 server
502 constructs Message Authentication Codes in the wrong way, and
503 expects the client to construct them in the same wrong way. PuTTY
504 constructs the MACs correctly by default, and hence these old
505 servers will fail to work with it.
507 If you are using PuTTY version 0.52 or better, this should work
508 automatically: PuTTY should detect the buggy servers from their
509 version number announcement, and automatically start to construct
510 its MACs in the same incorrect manner as they do, so it will be able
513 If you are using PuTTY version 0.51 or below, you can enable the
514 workaround by going to the SSH panel and ticking the box labelled
515 \q{Imitate SSH 2 MAC bug}. It's possible that you might have to do
516 this with 0.52 as well, if a buggy server exists that PuTTY doesn't
519 In this context MAC stands for Message Authentication Code. It's a
520 cryptographic term, and it has nothing at all to do with Ethernet
521 MAC (Media Access Control) addresses.
523 \S{faq-pscp-protocol}{Question} Why do I see \q{Fatal: Protocol
524 error: Expected control record} in PSCP?
526 This happens because PSCP was expecting to see data from the server
527 that was part of the PSCP protocol exchange, and instead it saw data
528 that it couldn't make any sense of at all.
530 This almost always happens because the startup scripts in your
531 account on the server machine are generating output. This is
532 impossible for PSCP, or any other SCP client, to work around. You
533 should never use startup files (\c{.bashrc}, \c{.cshrc} and so on)
534 which generate output in non-interactive sessions.
536 This is not actually a PuTTY problem. If PSCP fails in this way,
537 then all other SCP clients are likely to fail in exactly the same
538 way. The problem is at the server end.
540 \S{faq-colours}{Question} I clicked on a colour in the Colours
541 panel, and the colour didn't change in my terminal.
543 That isn't how you're supposed to use the Colours panel.
545 During the course of a session, PuTTY potentially uses \e{all} the
546 colours listed in the Colours panel. It's not a question of using
547 only one of them and you choosing which one; PuTTY will use them
548 \e{all}. The purpose of the Colours panel is to let you adjust the
549 appearance of all the colours. So to change the colour of the
550 cursor, for example, you would select \q{Cursor Colour}, press the
551 \q{Modify} button, and select a new colour from the dialog box that
552 appeared. Similarly, if you want your session to appear in green,
553 you should select \q{Default Foreground} and press \q{Modify}.
554 Clicking on \q{ANSI Green} won't turn your session green; it will
555 only allow you to adjust the \e{shade} of green used when PuTTY is
556 instructed by the server to display green text.
558 \S{faq-winsock2}{Question} Plink on Windows 95 says it can't find
561 Plink requires the extended Windows network library, WinSock version
562 2. This is installed as standard on Windows 98 and above, and on
563 Windows NT, and even on later versions of Windows 95; but early
564 Win95 installations don't have it.
566 In order to use Plink on these systems, you will need to download
568 \W{http://www.microsoft.com/windows95/downloads/contents/wuadmintools/s_wunetworkingtools/w95sockets2/}{WinSock 2 upgrade}:
570 \c http://www.microsoft.com/windows95/downloads/contents/
571 \c wuadmintools/s_wunetworkingtools/w95sockets2/
573 \S{faq-outofmem}{Question} After trying to establish an SSH 2
574 connection, PuTTY says \q{Out of memory} and dies.
576 If this happens just while the connection is starting up, this often
577 indicates that for some reason the client and server have failed to
578 establish a session encryption key. Somehow, they have performed
579 calculations that should have given each of them the same key, but
580 have ended up with different keys; so data encrypted by one and
581 decrypted by the other looks like random garbage.
583 This causes an \q{out of memory} error because the first encrypted
584 data PuTTY expects to see is the length of an SSH message. Normally
585 this will be something well under 100 bytes. If the decryption has
586 failed, PuTTY will see a completely random length in the region of
587 two \e{gigabytes}, and will try to allocate enough memory to store
588 this non-existent message. This will immediately lead to it thinking
589 it doesn't have enough memory, and panicking.
591 If this happens to you, it is quite likely to still be a PuTTY bug
592 and you should report it (although it might be a bug in your SSH
593 server instead); but it doesn't necessarily mean you've actually run
596 \S{faq-outofmem2}{Question} When attempting a file transfer, either
597 PSCP or PSFTP says \q{Out of memory} and dies.
599 This is almost always caused by your login scripts on the server
600 generating output. PSCP or PSFTP will receive that output when they
601 were expecting to see the start of a file transfer protocol, and
602 they will attempt to interpret the output as file-transfer protocol.
603 This will usually lead to an \q{out of memory} error for much the
604 same reasons as given in \k{faq-outofmem}.
606 This is a setup problem in your account on your server, \e{not} a
607 PSCP/PSFTP bug. Your login scripts should \e{never} generate output
608 during non-interactive sessions; secure file transfer is not the
609 only form of remote access that will break if they do.
611 On Unix, a simple fix is to ensure that all the parts of your login
612 script that might generate output are in \c{.profile} (if you use a
613 Bourne shell derivative) or \c{.login} (if you use a C shell).
614 Putting them in more general files such as \c{.bashrc} or \c{.cshrc}
615 is liable to lead to problems.
617 \S{faq-psftp-slow}{Question} PSFTP transfers files much slower than PSCP.
619 The throughput of PSFTP 0.54 should be much better than 0.53b and
620 prior; we've added code to the SFTP backend to queue several blocks
621 of data rather than waiting for an acknowledgement for each. (The
622 SCP backend did not suffer from this performance issue because SCP
623 is a much simpler protocol.)
625 \S{faq-bce}{Question} When I run full-colour applications, I see
626 areas of black space where colour ought to be.
628 You almost certainly need to enable the \q{Use background colour to
629 erase screen} setting in the Terminal panel. Note that if you do
630 this in mid-session, in versions before 0.54, it may not take effect
631 until you reset the terminal (see \k{faq-resetterm}).
633 \S{faq-resetterm}{Question} When I change some terminal settings,
636 Some of the terminal options (notably Auto Wrap and
637 background-colour screen erase) actually represent the \e{default}
638 setting, rather than the currently active setting. The server can
639 send sequences that modify these options in mid-session, but when
640 the terminal is reset (by server action, or by you choosing \q{Reset
641 Terminal} from the System menu) the defaults are restored.
643 In versions 0.53b and prior, if you change one of these options in
644 the middle of a session, you will find that the change does not
645 immediately take effect. It will only take effect once you reset
648 In version 0.54, the behaviour has changed - changes to these
649 settings take effect immediately.
651 \S{faq-idleout}{Question} My PuTTY sessions unexpectedly close after
652 they are idle for a while.
654 Some types of firewall, and almost any router doing Network Address
655 Translation (NAT, also known as IP masquerading), will forget about
656 a connection through them if the connection does nothing for too
657 long. This will cause the connection to be rudely cut off when
660 You can try to combat this by telling PuTTY to send \e{keepalives}:
661 packets of data which have no effect on the actual session, but
662 which reassure the router or firewall that the network connection is
663 still active and worth remembering about.
665 Keepalives don't solve everything, unfortunately; although they
666 cause greater robustness against this sort of router, they can also
667 cause a \e{loss} of robustness against network dropouts. See
668 \k{config-keepalive} in the documentation for more discussion of
671 \S{faq-timeout}{Question} PuTTY's network connections time out too
672 quickly when network connectivity is temporarily lost.
674 This is a Windows problem, not a PuTTY problem. The timeout value
675 can't be set on per application or per session basis. To increase
676 the TCP timeout globally, you need to tinker with the Registry.
678 On Windows 95, 98 or ME, the registry key you need to create or
681 \c HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VxD\
682 \c MSTCP\MaxDataRetries
684 (it must be of type DWORD in Win95, or String in Win98/ME).
685 (See MS Knowledge Base article
686 \W{http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;158474}{158474}
687 for more information.)
689 On Windows NT or 2000, the registry key is
691 \c HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\
692 \c Parameters\TcpMaxDataRetransmissions
694 and it must be of type DWORD.
695 (See MS Knowledge Base article
696 \W{http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;120642}{120642}
697 for more information.)
699 Set the key's value to something like 10. This will cause Windows to
700 try harder to keep connections alive instead of abandoning them.
702 \S{faq-puttyputty}{Question} When I \cw{cat} a binary file, I get
703 \q{PuTTYPuTTYPuTTY} on my command line.
707 This is designed behaviour; when PuTTY receives the character
708 Control-E from the remote server, it interprets it as a request to
709 identify itself, and so it sends back the string \q{\cw{PuTTY}} as
710 if that string had been entered at the keyboard. Control-E should
711 only be sent by programs that are prepared to deal with the
712 response. Writing a binary file to your terminal is likely to output
713 many Control-E characters, and cause this behaviour. Don't do it.
716 To mitigate the effects, you could configure the answerback string
717 to be empty (see \k{config-answerback}); but writing binary files to
718 your terminal is likely to cause various other unpleasant behaviour,
719 so this is only a small remedy.
721 \S{faq-wintitle}{Question} When I \cw{cat} a binary file, my window
722 title changes to a nonsense string.
726 It is designed behaviour that PuTTY should have the ability to
727 adjust the window title on instructions from the server. Normally
728 the control sequence that does this should only be sent
729 deliberately, by programs that know what they are doing and intend
730 to put meaningful text in the window title. Writing a binary file to
731 your terminal runs the risk of sending the same control sequence by
732 accident, and cause unexpected changes in the window title. Don't do
735 \S{faq-password-fails}{Question} My keyboard stops working once
736 PuTTY displays the password prompt.
738 No, it doesn't. PuTTY just doesn't display the password you type, so
739 that someone looking at your screen can't see what it is.
741 Unlike the Windows login prompts, PuTTY doesn't display the password
742 as a row of asterisks either. This is so that someone looking at
743 your screen can't even tell how \e{long} your password is, which
744 might be valuable information.
746 \S{faq-keyboard}{Question} One or more function keys don't do what I
747 expected in a server-side application.
749 If you've already tried all the relevant options in the PuTTY
750 Keyboard panel, you may need to mail the PuTTY maintainers and ask.
752 It is \e{not} usually helpful just to tell us which application,
753 which server operating system, and which key isn't working; in order
754 to replicate the problem we would need to have a copy of every
755 operating system, and every application, that anyone has ever
758 PuTTY responds to function key presses by sending a sequence of
759 control characters to the server. If a function key isn't doing what
760 you expect, it's likely that the character sequence your application
761 is expecting to receive is not the same as the one PuTTY is sending.
762 Therefore what we really need to know is \e{what} sequence the
763 application is expecting.
765 The simplest way to investigate this is to find some other terminal
766 environment, in which that function key \e{does} work; and then
767 investigate what sequence the function key is sending in that
768 situation. One reasonably easy way to do this on a Unix system is to
769 type the command \c{cat}, and then press the function key. This is
770 likely to produce output of the form \c{^[[11~}. You can also do
771 this in PuTTY, to find out what sequence the function key is
772 producing in that. Then you can mail the PuTTY maintainers and tell
773 us \q{I wanted the F1 key to send \c{^[[11~}, but instead it's
774 sending \c{^[OP}, can this be done?}, or something similar.
776 You should still read the
777 \W{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/feedback.html}{Feedback
778 page} on the PuTTY website (also provided as \k{feedback} in the
779 manual), and follow the guidelines contained in that.
781 \S{faq-openssh-bad-openssl}{Question} Since my SSH server was upgraded
782 to OpenSSH 3.1p1/3.4p1, I can no longer connect with PuTTY.
784 There is a known problem when OpenSSH has been built against an
785 incorrect version of OpenSSL; the quick workaround is to configure
786 PuTTY to use SSH protocol 2 and the Blowfish cipher.
788 For more details and OpenSSH patches, see
789 \W{http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138}{bug 138} in the
792 This is not a PuTTY-specific problem; if you try to connect with
793 another client you'll likely have similar problems. (Although PuTTY's
794 default cipher differs from many other clients.)
796 \e{OpenSSH 3.1p1:} configurations known to be broken (and symptoms):
798 \b SSH 2 with AES cipher (PuTTY says "Assertion failed! Expression:
799 (len & 15) == 0" in sshaes.c, or "Out of memory", or crashes)
801 \b SSH 2 with 3DES (PuTTY says "Incorrect MAC received on packet")
803 \b SSH 1 with Blowfish (PuTTY says "Incorrect CRC received on
808 \e{OpenSSH 3.4p1:} as of 3.4p1, only the problem with SSH 1 and
809 Blowfish remains. Rebuild your server, apply the patch linked to from
810 bug 138 above, or use another cipher (e.g., 3DES) instead.
812 \e{Other versions:} we occasionally get reports of the same symptom
813 and workarounds with older versions of OpenSSH, although it's not
814 clear the underlying cause is the same.
816 \S{faq-ssh2key-ssh1conn}{Question} Why do I see "Couldn't load private
817 key from ..."? Why can PuTTYgen load my key but not PuTTY?
819 It's likely that you've generated an SSH protocol 2 key with PuTTYgen,
820 but you're trying to use it in an SSH 1 connection. SSH1 and SSH2 keys
821 have different formats, and (at least in 0.52) PuTTY's reporting of a
822 key in the wrong format isn't optimal.
824 To connect using SSH 2 to a server that supports both versions, you
825 need to change the configuration from the default (see \k{faq-ssh2}).
827 \S{faq-rh8-utf8}{Question} When I'm connected to a Red Hat Linux 8.0
828 system, some characters don't display properly.
830 A common complaint is that hyphens in man pages show up as a-acute.
832 With release 8.0, Red Hat appear to have made UTF-8 the default
833 character set. There appears to be no way for terminal emulators such
834 as PuTTY to know this (as far as we know, the appropriate escape
835 sequence to switch into UTF-8 mode isn't sent).
837 A fix is to configure sessions to RH8 systems to use UTF-8
838 translation - see \k{config-charset} in the documentation. (Note that
839 if you use \q{Change Settings}, changes may not take place immediately
840 - see \k{faq-resetterm}.)
842 If you really want to change the character set used by the server, the
843 right place is \c{/etc/sysconfig/i18n}, but this shouldn't be
846 \S{faq-screen}{Question} Since I upgraded to PuTTY 0.54, the
847 scrollback has stopped working when I run \c{screen}.
849 PuTTY's terminal emulator has always had the policy that when the
850 \q{alternate screen} is in use, nothing is added to the scrollback.
851 This is because the usual sorts of programs which use the alternate
852 screen are things like text editors, which tend to scroll back and
853 forth in the same document a lot; so (a) they would fill up the
854 scrollback with a large amount of unhelpfully disordered text, and
855 (b) they contain their \e{own} method for the user to scroll back to
856 the bit they were interested in. We have generally found this policy
857 to do the Right Thing in almost all situations.
859 Unfortunately, \c{screen} is one exception: it uses the alternate
860 screen, but it's still usually helpful to have PuTTY's scrollback
861 continue working. The simplest solution is to go to the Features
862 control panel and tick \q{Disable switching to alternate terminal
863 screen}. (See \k{config-features-altscreen} for more details.)
865 The reason why this only started to be a problem in 0.54 is because
866 \c{screen} typically uses an unusual control sequence to switch to
867 the alternate screen, and previous versions of PuTTY did not support
870 \S{faq-alternate-localhost}{Question} Since I upgraded Windows XP
871 to Service Pack 2, I can't use addresses like \cw{127.0.0.2}.
873 Some people who ask PuTTY to listen on localhost addresses other
874 than \cw{127.0.0.1} to forward services such as SMB and Windows
875 Terminal Services have found that doing so no longer works since
876 they upgraded to WinXP SP2.
878 This is apparently an issue with SP2 that is acknowledged by Microsoft
879 in MS Knowledge Base article
880 \W{http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;884020}{884020}.
881 The article links to a fix you can download.
883 (\e{However}, we've been told that SP2 \e{also} fixes the bug that
884 means you need to use non-\cw{127.0.0.1} addresses to forward
885 Terminal Services in the first place.)
887 \S{faq-missing-slash}{Question} PSFTP commands seem to be missing a
888 directory separator (slash).
890 Some people have reported the following incorrect behaviour with
895 \c Remote directory is /dir1/dir2
896 \c psftp> get filename.ext
898 \c /dir1/dir2filename.ext: no such file or directory
900 This is not a bug in PSFTP. There is a known bug in some versions of
902 (\W{http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697}{bug 697}) that
903 causes these symptoms; it appears to have been introduced around
904 3.7.x. It manifests only on certain platforms (AIX is what has been
907 There is a patch for OpenSSH attached to that bug; it's also fixed in
908 recent versions of portable OpenSSH (from around 3.8).
910 \H{faq-secure} Security questions
912 \S{faq-publicpc}{Question} Is it safe for me to download PuTTY and
913 use it on a public PC?
915 It depends on whether you trust that PC. If you don't trust the
916 public PC, don't use PuTTY on it, and don't use any other software
917 you plan to type passwords into either. It might be watching your
918 keystrokes, or it might tamper with the PuTTY binary you download.
919 There is \e{no} program safe enough that you can run it on an
920 actively malicious PC and get away with typing passwords into it.
922 If you do trust the PC, then it's probably OK to use PuTTY on it
923 (but if you don't trust the network, then the PuTTY download might
924 be tampered with, so it would be better to carry PuTTY with you on a
927 \S{faq-cleanup}{Question} What does PuTTY leave on a system? How can
930 PuTTY will leave some Registry entries, and a random seed file, on
931 the PC (see \k{faq-settings}). If you are using PuTTY on a public
932 PC, or somebody else's PC, you might want to clean these up when you
933 leave. You can do that automatically, by running the command
936 \S{faq-dsa}{Question} How come PuTTY now supports DSA, when the
937 website used to say how insecure it was?
939 DSA has a major weakness \e{if badly implemented}: it relies on a
940 random number generator to far too great an extent. If the random
941 number generator produces a number an attacker can predict, the DSA
942 private key is exposed - meaning that the attacker can log in as you
943 on all systems that accept that key.
945 The PuTTY policy changed because the developers were informed of
946 ways to implement DSA which do not suffer nearly as badly from this
947 weakness, and indeed which don't need to rely on random numbers at
948 all. For this reason we now believe PuTTY's DSA implementation is
949 probably OK. However, if you have the choice, we still recommend you
952 \S{faq-virtuallock}{Question} Couldn't Pageant use
953 \cw{VirtualLock()} to stop private keys being written to disk?
955 Unfortunately not. The \cw{VirtualLock()} function in the Windows
956 API doesn't do a proper job: it may prevent small pieces of a
957 process's memory from being paged to disk while the process is
958 running, but it doesn't stop the process's memory as a whole from
959 being swapped completely out to disk when the process is long-term
960 inactive. And Pageant spends most of its time inactive.
962 \H{faq-admin} Administrative questions
964 \S{faq-domain}{Question} Would you like me to register you a nicer
967 No, thank you. Even if you can find one (most of them seem to have
968 been registered already, by people who didn't ask whether we
969 actually wanted it before they applied), we're happy with the PuTTY
970 web site being exactly where it is. It's not hard to find (just type
971 \q{putty} into \W{http://www.google.com/}{google.com} and we're the
972 first link returned), and we don't believe the administrative hassle
973 of moving the site would be worth the benefit.
975 In addition, if we \e{did} want a custom domain name, we would want
976 to run it ourselves, so we knew for certain that it would continue
977 to point where we wanted it, and wouldn't suddenly change or do
978 strange things. Having it registered for us by a third party who we
979 don't even know is not the best way to achieve this.
981 \S{faq-webhosting}{Question} Would you like free web hosting for the
984 We already have some, thanks.
986 \S{faq-link}{Question} Would you link to my web site from the PuTTY
989 Only if the content of your web page is of definite direct interest
990 to PuTTY users. If your content is unrelated, or only tangentially
991 related, to PuTTY, then the link would simply be advertising for
994 One very nice effect of the Google ranking mechanism is that by and
995 large, the most popular web sites get the highest rankings. This
996 means that when an ordinary person does a search, the top item in
997 the search is very likely to be a high-quality site or the site they
998 actually wanted, rather than the site which paid the most money for
1001 The PuTTY web site is held in high esteem by Google, for precisely
1002 this reason: lots of people have linked to it simply because they
1003 like PuTTY, without us ever having to ask anyone to link to us. We
1004 feel that it would be an abuse of this esteem to use it to boost the
1005 ranking of random advertisers' web sites. If you want your web site
1006 to have a high Google ranking, we'd prefer that you achieve this the
1007 way we did - by being good enough at what you do that people will
1008 link to you simply because they like you.
1010 In particular, we aren't interested in trading links for money (see
1011 above), and we \e{certainly} aren't interested in trading links for
1012 other links (since we have no advertising on our web site, our
1013 Google ranking is not even directly worth anything to us). If we
1014 don't want to link to you for free, then we probably won't want to
1017 If you have software based on PuTTY, or specifically designed to
1018 interoperate with PuTTY, or in some other way of genuine interest to
1019 PuTTY users, then we will probably be happy to add a link to you on
1020 our Links page. And if you're running a mirror of the PuTTY web
1021 site, we're \e{definitely} interested.
1023 \S{faq-sourceforge}{Question} Why don't you move PuTTY to
1026 Partly, because we don't want to move the web site location (see
1029 Also, security reasons. PuTTY is a security product, and as such it
1030 is particularly important to guard the code and the web site against
1031 unauthorised modifications which might introduce subtle security
1032 flaws. Therefore, we prefer that the Subversion repository, web site and
1033 FTP site remain where they are, under the direct control of system
1034 administrators we know and trust personally, rather than being run
1035 by a large organisation full of people we've never met and which is
1036 known to have had breakins in the past.
1038 No offence to SourceForge; I think they do a wonderful job. But
1039 they're not ideal for everyone, and in particular they're not ideal
1042 \S{faq-mailinglist1}{Question} Why can't I subscribe to the
1043 putty-bugs mailing list?
1045 Because you're not a member of the PuTTY core development team. The
1046 putty-bugs mailing list is not a general newsgroup-like discussion
1047 forum; it's a contact address for the core developers, and an
1048 \e{internal} mailing list for us to discuss things among ourselves.
1049 If we opened it up for everybody to subscribe to, it would turn into
1050 something more like a newsgroup and we would be completely
1051 overwhelmed by the volume of traffic. It's hard enough to keep up
1052 with the list as it is.
1054 \S{faq-mailinglist2}{Question} If putty-bugs isn't a
1055 general-subscription mailing list, what is?
1057 There isn't one, that we know of.
1059 If someone else wants to set up a mailing list or other forum for
1060 PuTTY users to help each other with common problems, that would be
1061 fine with us, though the PuTTY team would almost certainly not have the
1062 time to read it. It's probably better to use one of the established
1063 newsgroups for this purpose (see \k{feedback-other-fora}).
1065 \S{faq-donations}{Question} How can I donate to PuTTY development?
1067 Please, \e{please} don't feel you have to. PuTTY is completely free
1068 software, and not shareware. We think it's very important that
1069 \e{everybody} who wants to use PuTTY should be able to, whether they
1070 have any money or not; so the last thing we would want is for a
1071 PuTTY user to feel guilty because they haven't paid us any money. If
1072 you want to keep your money, please do keep it. We wouldn't dream of
1075 Having said all that, if you still really \e{want} to give us money,
1076 we won't argue :-) The easiest way for us to accept donations is if
1077 you send money to \cw{<anakin@pobox.com>} using PayPal
1078 (\W{http://www.paypal.com/}\cw{www.paypal.com}). Alternatively, if
1079 you don't trust PayPal, you could donate through e-gold
1080 (\W{http://www.e-gold.com}\cw{www.e-gold.com}): deposit your
1081 donation in account number 174769, then send us e-mail to let us
1082 know you've done so (otherwise we might not notice for months!).
1084 Small donations (tens of dollars or tens of euros) will probably be
1085 spent on beer or curry, which helps motivate our volunteer team to
1086 continue doing this for the world. Larger donations will be spent on
1087 something that actually helps development, if we can find anything
1088 (perhaps new hardware, or a copy of Windows XP), but if we can't
1089 find anything then we'll just distribute the money among the
1090 developers. If you want to be sure your donation is going towards
1091 something worthwhile, ask us first. If you don't like these terms,
1092 feel perfectly free not to donate. We don't mind.
1094 \S{faq-permission}{Question} Can I have permission to put PuTTY on a
1095 cover disk / distribute it with other software / etc?
1097 Yes. You need not bother asking us explicitly for permission. You
1098 already have permission. Redistribution of the unmodified PuTTY
1099 binary in this way is entirely permitted by our licence (see
1100 \k{licence}), and you are welcome to do it as much as you like.
1102 If you are distributing PuTTY within your own organisation, or for
1103 use with your own product, then we recommend (but do not insist)
1104 that you offer your own first-line technical support, to answer
1105 questions directly relating to the interaction of PuTTY with your
1106 particular environment. If your users mail us directly, we won't be
1107 able to give them very much help about things specific to your own
1110 \H{faq-misc} Miscellaneous questions
1112 \S{faq-openssh}{Question} Is PuTTY a port of OpenSSH, or based on
1115 No, it isn't. PuTTY is almost completely composed of code written
1116 from scratch for PuTTY. The only code we share with OpenSSH is the
1117 detector for SSH1 CRC compensation attacks, written by CORE SDI S.A.
1119 \S{faq-sillyputty}{Question} Where can I buy silly putty?
1121 You're looking at the wrong web site; the only PuTTY we know about
1122 here is the name of a computer program.
1124 If you want the kind of putty you can buy as an executive toy, the
1125 PuTTY team can personally recommend Thinking Putty, which you can
1126 buy from Crazy Aaron's Putty World, at
1127 \W{http://www.puttyworld.com}\cw{www.puttyworld.com}.
1129 \S{faq-meaning}{Question} What does \q{PuTTY} mean?
1131 It's the name of a popular SSH and Telnet client. Any other meaning
1132 is in the eye of the beholder. It's been rumoured that \q{PuTTY}
1133 is the antonym of \q{\cw{getty}}, or that it's the stuff that makes your
1134 Windows useful, or that it's a kind of plutonium Teletype. We
1135 couldn't possibly comment on such allegations.
1137 \S{faq-pronounce}{Question} How do I pronounce \q{PuTTY}?
1139 Exactly like the English word \q{putty}, which we pronounce
1140 /\u02C8{'}p\u028C{V}t\u026A{I}/.