}
}
+ /*
+ * If the supply's parent device is not the same as the
+ * regulator's parent device, then ensure the parent device
+ * is bound before we resolve the supply, in case the parent
+ * device get probe deferred and unregisters the supply.
+ */
+ if (r->dev.parent && r->dev.parent != rdev->dev.parent) {
+ if (!device_is_bound(r->dev.parent)) {
+ put_device(&r->dev);
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Recursively resolve the supply of the supply */
ret = regulator_resolve_supply(r);
if (ret < 0) {
seq_puts(s, "\n");
list_for_each_entry(consumer, &rdev->consumer_list, list) {
- if (consumer->dev->class == ®ulator_class)
+ if (consumer->dev && consumer->dev->class == ®ulator_class)
continue;
seq_printf(s, "%*s%-*s ",
(level + 1) * 3 + 1, "",
- 30 - (level + 1) * 3, dev_name(consumer->dev));
+ 30 - (level + 1) * 3,
+ consumer->dev ? dev_name(consumer->dev) : "deviceless");
switch (rdev->desc->type) {
case REGULATOR_VOLTAGE:
if (of_have_populated_dt())
has_full_constraints = true;
+ /*
+ * Regulators may had failed to resolve their input supplies
+ * when were registered, either because the input supply was
+ * not registered yet or because its parent device was not
+ * bound yet. So attempt to resolve the input supplies for
+ * pending regulators before trying to disable unused ones.
+ */
+ class_for_each_device(®ulator_class, NULL, NULL,
+ regulator_register_resolve_supply);
+
/* If we have a full configuration then disable any regulators
* we have permission to change the status for and which are
* not in use or always_on. This is effectively the default