]> asedeno.scripts.mit.edu Git - linux.git/commit
lockd: convert nlm_rqst.a_count from atomic_t to refcount_t
authorElena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:15:46 +0000 (13:15 +0200)
committerTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:06:30 +0000 (23:06 -0500)
commitfbca30c51350399f49b09421b5ee2ef8d00c05d8
tree7efcc7716084b41653c8811b93a5ece05530a579
parent431f125b67d51a84b93095a7df6b3c30222753b1
lockd: convert nlm_rqst.a_count from atomic_t to refcount_t

atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference
counters with the following properties:
 - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
 - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
 - once counter reaches zero, its further
   increments aren't allowed
 - counter schema uses basic atomic operations
   (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)

Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows
and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows
can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.

The variable nlm_rqst.a_count is used as pure reference counter.
Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations.

**Important note for maintainers:

Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c
have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic
counterparts.
The full comparison can be seen in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/57 and it is hopefully soon
in state to be merged to the documentation tree.
Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides
enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in
some rare cases it might matter.
Please double check that you don't have some undocumented
memory guarantees for this variable usage.

For the nlm_rqst.a_count it might make a difference
in following places:
 - nlmclnt_release_call() and nlmsvc_release_call(): decrement
   in refcount_dec_and_test() only
   provides RELEASE ordering and control dependency on success
   vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
fs/lockd/clntproc.c
fs/lockd/svcproc.c
include/linux/lockd/lockd.h