virtiofs: Fix old-style declaration

There expect the 'static' keyword to come first in a declaration, and we
get warnings like this with "make W=1":

fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c:687:1: warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c:692:1: warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c:1029:1: warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index a5c86048b96edb59f85986935206f2c53972a170..3d21248014b455a7e3369e74bdeb4ca5a0e697cf 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -684,12 +684,12 @@ static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
 
-const static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
+static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
        { VIRTIO_ID_FS, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
        {},
 };
 
-const static unsigned int feature_table[] = {};
+static const unsigned int feature_table[] = {};
 
 static struct virtio_driver virtio_fs_driver = {
        .driver.name            = KBUILD_MODNAME,
@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
        }
 }
 
-const static struct fuse_iqueue_ops virtio_fs_fiq_ops = {
+static const struct fuse_iqueue_ops virtio_fs_fiq_ops = {
        .wake_forget_and_unlock         = virtio_fs_wake_forget_and_unlock,
        .wake_interrupt_and_unlock      = virtio_fs_wake_interrupt_and_unlock,
        .wake_pending_and_unlock        = virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock,