atomics: Add header comment so spin_unlock_wait()

There is material describing the ordering guarantees provided by
spin_unlock_wait(), but it is not necessarily easy to find.  This commit
therefore adds a docbook header comment to this function informally
describing its semantics.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 59248dcc6ef3493388eb8c78ba241eea7bcb6a4d..d9510e8522d4d33d11bc7e1f9e699f9c353a28ef 100644 (file)
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -369,6 +369,26 @@ static __always_inline int spin_trylock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
        raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
 })
 
+/**
+ * spin_unlock_wait - Interpose between successive critical sections
+ * @lock: the spinlock whose critical sections are to be interposed.
+ *
+ * Semantically this is equivalent to a spin_lock() immediately
+ * followed by a spin_unlock().  However, most architectures have
+ * more efficient implementations in which the spin_unlock_wait()
+ * cannot block concurrent lock acquisition, and in some cases
+ * where spin_unlock_wait() does not write to the lock variable.
+ * Nevertheless, spin_unlock_wait() can have high overhead, so if
+ * you feel the need to use it, please check to see if there is
+ * a better way to get your job done.
+ *
+ * The ordering guarantees provided by spin_unlock_wait() are:
+ *
+ * 1.  All accesses preceding the spin_unlock_wait() happen before
+ *     any accesses in later critical sections for this same lock.
+ * 2.  All accesses following the spin_unlock_wait() happen after
+ *     any accesses in earlier critical sections for this same lock.
+ */
 static __always_inline void spin_unlock_wait(spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        raw_spin_unlock_wait(&lock->rlock);