The WARN_ON_SMP() comment header suggests using spin_is_locked() to
check for locks being held. But these days we prefer lockdep_assert_held(),
so this commit removes that suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
/*
* WARN_ON_SMP() is for cases that the warning is either
* meaningless for !SMP or may even cause failures.
- * This is usually used for cases that we have
- * WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&lock)) checks, as spin_is_locked()
- * returns 0 for uniprocessor settings.
* It can also be used with values that are only defined
* on SMP:
*