x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay

__const_udelay is marked inline, and LTO will happily inline it everywhere

Dropping the inline saves ~44k text in a LTO build.

13999560        1740864 1499136 17239560        1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline
13954764        1736768 1499136 17190668        1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline

Inlining it has no advantage in general, so its the right thing to do.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171222001821.2157-2-andi@firstfloor.org

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index 553f8fd23cc4733d0edafa862b95446f7a04bab1..09c83b2f80d24dbd957b6452840ca6111128599e 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
 
-inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
+void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
 {
        unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
        int d0;