From: Li Zefan Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:58:58 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Btrfs: zero unused bytes in inode item X-Git-Tag: v3.6-rc1~81^2~14 X-Git-Url: https://asedeno.scripts.mit.edu/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=293f7e07405a63975cee4e95a2cfa0c17b34b3aa;p=linux.git Btrfs: zero unused bytes in inode item The otime field is not zeroed, so users will see random otime in an old filesystem with a new kernel which has otime support in the future. The reserved bytes are also not zeroed, and we'll have compatibility issue if we make use of those bytes. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 21d91a8073ee..335605c8ceab 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static inline void btrfs_init_delayed_node( INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_node->n_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_node->p_list); delayed_node->bytes_reserved = 0; + memset(&delayed_node->inode_item, 0, sizeof(delayed_node->inode_item)); } static inline int btrfs_is_continuous_delayed_item( diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index ee45ebf42192..144f4642b2a9 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4693,6 +4693,8 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; inode_item = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0], struct btrfs_inode_item); + memset_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0], 0, (unsigned long)inode_item, + sizeof(*inode_item)); fill_inode_item(trans, path->nodes[0], inode_item, inode); ref = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0] + 1,