From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:27:34 +0000 (-0700) Subject: revert "memcg: track all children over limit in the root" X-Git-Tag: v3.12-rc3~33^2~12 X-Git-Url: https://asedeno.scripts.mit.edu/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8f939a9f4c769500c58c31ec81ce17297388f4bf;p=linux.git revert "memcg: track all children over limit in the root" Revert commit 1be171d60bdd ("memcg: track all children over limit in the root") I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the overall design direction and the future remains unclear. Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index d5ff3ce13029..5ee0af463f2e 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -851,15 +851,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_soft_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) /* * Necessary to update all ancestors when hierarchy is used * because their event counter is not touched. - * We track children even outside the hierarchy for the root - * cgroup because tree walk starting at root should visit - * all cgroups and we want to prevent from pointless tree - * walk if no children is below the limit. */ while (delta && (parent = parent_mem_cgroup(parent))) atomic_add(delta, &parent->children_in_excess); - if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup && !root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy) - atomic_add(delta, &root_mem_cgroup->children_in_excess); spin_unlock(&memcg->soft_lock); } @@ -6112,9 +6106,6 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css) if (memcg->soft_contributed) { while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))) atomic_dec(&memcg->children_in_excess); - - if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup && !root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy) - atomic_dec(&root_mem_cgroup->children_in_excess); } mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(memcg); vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);