From: Jonathan Brassow Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:23:13 +0000 (+1000) Subject: DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each X-Git-Tag: v3.4-rc5~39^2~2 X-Git-Url: https://asedeno.scripts.mit.edu/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a9ad8526bb1af0741a5c0e01155dac08e7bdde60;p=linux.git DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe Commit dafb20fa34320a472deb7442f25a0c086e0feb33 mistakenly replaced a safe iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c index b0ba52459ed7..68965e663248 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs) int ret; unsigned redundancy = 0; struct raid_dev *dev; - struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest; + struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest; struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md; switch (rs->raid_type->level) { @@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs) } freshest = NULL; - rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) { + rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) { if (!rdev->meta_bdev) continue;