From: Timur Tabi Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:57:10 +0000 (-0600) Subject: pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: improve error checking and reporting X-Git-Tag: v4.5-rc1~154^2~53 X-Git-Url: https://asedeno.scripts.mit.edu/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=beee39099b9041c8bcb50e771d0cc6aea4e79e45;p=linux.git pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: improve error checking and reporting The driver doesn't report an error message if the ACPI tables are missing the num-gpios property (which indicates how many GPIOs there are on this SOC), and it didn't check to ensure that the mallocs didn't fail. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi Reviewed-by: Björn Andersson Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c index e9ff3bc150bb..f448534edf46 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ static struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data qdf2xxx_pinctrl; +/* A reasonable limit to the number of GPIOS */ +#define MAX_GPIOS 256 + static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins; @@ -42,11 +45,13 @@ static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Query the number of GPIOs from ACPI */ ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "num-gpios", &num_gpios); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "missing num-gpios property\n"); return ret; + } - if (!num_gpios) { - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "missing num-gpios property\n"); + if (!num_gpios || num_gpios > MAX_GPIOS) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "invalid num-gpios property\n"); return -ENODEV; } @@ -55,6 +60,9 @@ static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) groups = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_gpios, sizeof(struct msm_pingroup), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pins || !groups) + return -ENOMEM; + for (i = 0; i < num_gpios; i++) { pins[i].number = i;