From 14f1cfd4f7b4794e2f9d2ae214bcf049654b0b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Hunter Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:38:30 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Rationalize intel_pt_sync_switch()'s use of next_tid Returning 1 from intel_pt_sync_switch() causes the current tid to be set. That negates the need to keep next_tid anymore. Rationalize the code to that effect. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter Cc: Jiri Olsa Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190412113830.4126-9-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c index 6aaba1146fc8..7a70693c1b91 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c @@ -1859,7 +1859,6 @@ static int intel_pt_sync_switch(struct intel_pt *pt, int cpu, pid_t tid, switch (ptq->switch_state) { case INTEL_PT_SS_NOT_TRACING: - ptq->next_tid = -1; break; case INTEL_PT_SS_UNKNOWN: case INTEL_PT_SS_TRACING: @@ -1879,13 +1878,14 @@ static int intel_pt_sync_switch(struct intel_pt *pt, int cpu, pid_t tid, ptq->switch_state = INTEL_PT_SS_TRACING; break; case INTEL_PT_SS_EXPECTING_SWITCH_IP: - ptq->next_tid = tid; intel_pt_log("ERROR: cpu %d expecting switch ip\n", cpu); break; default: break; } + ptq->next_tid = -1; + return 1; } -- 2.45.2