From 3cc31a0d5bc77e35229671307eba5ea5c4c4cb9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:00:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: pass number of devices to btrfs_check_raid_min_devices Before this patch, btrfs_check_raid_min_devices would do an off-by-one check of the constraints and not the miminmum check, as its name suggests. This is not a problem if the only caller is device remove, but would be confusing for others. Add an argument with the exact number and let the caller(s) decide if this needs any adjustments, like when device replace is running. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain Tested-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 9051b4472bea..e966f0ce07f8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -1706,20 +1706,17 @@ static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_root *root, return ret; } -static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) +/* + * Verify that @num_devices satisfies the RAID profile constraints in the whole + * filesystem. It's up to the caller to adjust that number regarding eg. device + * replace. + */ +static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, + u64 num_devices) { u64 all_avail; - u64 num_devices; unsigned seq; - num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices; - btrfs_dev_replace_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace, 0); - if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) { - WARN_ON(num_devices < 1); - num_devices--; - } - btrfs_dev_replace_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace, 0); - do { seq = read_seqbegin(&fs_info->profiles_lock); @@ -1728,21 +1725,21 @@ static int btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits; } while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq)); - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) && num_devices <= 4) { + if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) && num_devices < 4) { return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID10_MIN_NOT_MET; } - if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) && num_devices <= 2) { + if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1) && num_devices < 2) { return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1_MIN_NOT_MET; } if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5) && - fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices <= 2) { + fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 2) { return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID5_MIN_NOT_MET; } if ((all_avail & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6) && - fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices <= 3) { + fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices < 3) { return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID6_MIN_NOT_MET; } @@ -1761,7 +1758,15 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path, u64 devid) mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); - ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(root->fs_info); + num_devices = root->fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices; + btrfs_dev_replace_lock(&root->fs_info->dev_replace, 0); + if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&root->fs_info->dev_replace)) { + WARN_ON(num_devices < 1); + num_devices--; + } + btrfs_dev_replace_unlock(&root->fs_info->dev_replace, 0); + + ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(root->fs_info, num_devices - 1); if (ret) goto out; -- 2.45.2