From 4b211f2b129dd1f6a6956bbc76e2f232c1ec3ad8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mathieu Poirier Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:59:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Streamle calls to task_rq_unlock() Calls to task_rq_unlock() are done several times in the __sched_setscheduler() function. This is fine when only the rq lock needs to be handled but not so much when other locks come into play. This patch streamlines the release of the rq lock so that only one location need to be modified when dealing with more than one lock. No change of functionality is introduced by this patch. Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Acked-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 0b22e55cebe8..1af3d2dc6b29 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4712,8 +4712,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, * Changing the policy of the stop threads its a very bad idea: */ if (p == rq->stop) { - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); - return -EINVAL; + retval = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; } /* @@ -4731,8 +4731,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, goto change; p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork; - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); - return 0; + retval = 0; + goto unlock; } change: @@ -4745,8 +4745,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) && task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 && !task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) { - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); - return -EPERM; + retval = -EPERM; + goto unlock; } #endif #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -4761,8 +4761,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, */ if (!cpumask_subset(span, p->cpus_ptr) || rq->rd->dl_bw.bw == 0) { - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); - return -EPERM; + retval = -EPERM; + goto unlock; } } #endif @@ -4781,8 +4781,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, * is available. */ if ((dl_policy(policy) || dl_task(p)) && sched_dl_overflow(p, policy, attr)) { - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); - return -EBUSY; + retval = -EBUSY; + goto unlock; } p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork; @@ -4840,6 +4840,10 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, preempt_enable(); return 0; + +unlock: + task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); + return retval; } static int _sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy, -- 2.45.2