From 71842aeceff824672016ef736f668f0f7a556931 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Drokin Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:49:55 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments. These two comments certainly refer to some ifdefed code that is no longer present, so remove them too. Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c index 210304f2cc70..8608b0984ff6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c @@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ struct cfs_hash_ops pool_hash_operations = { }; -/* ifdef needed for liblustre support */ /* * pool debugfs seq_file methods */ @@ -432,7 +431,6 @@ int lov_pool_new(struct obd_device *obd, char *poolname) INIT_HLIST_NODE(&new_pool->pool_hash); - /* we need this assert seq_file is not implemented for liblustre */ /* get ref for debugfs file */ lov_pool_getref(new_pool); new_pool->pool_debugfs_entry = ldebugfs_add_simple( -- 2.45.2