From 7b6abce7e1e69b6d8dc5d40a8cb9ddaeb400427c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Garry Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:56:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] sched/completions/Documentation: Fix a couple of punctuation nits This patch fixes a couple of punctuation nits which can make the document more correct and readable. Also missing "()" are added to some function references for consistency. Signed-off-by: John Garry Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: corbet@lwn.net Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1539183392-239389-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt index 656cf803c006..108bd0f264b3 100644 --- a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.txt @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ A typical usage scenario is: This is not implying any temporal order on wait_for_completion() and the call to complete() - if the call to complete() happened before the call to wait_for_completion() then the waiting side simply will continue -immediately as all dependencies are satisfied if not it will block until +immediately as all dependencies are satisfied; if not, it will block until completion is signaled by complete(). Note that wait_for_completion() is calling spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(), @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ wait_for_completion(): The default behavior is to wait without a timeout and to mark the task as uninterruptible. wait_for_completion() and its variants are only safe in process context (as they can sleep) but not in atomic context, -interrupt context, with disabled irqs. or preemption is disabled - see also +interrupt context, with disabled irqs, or preemption is disabled - see also try_wait_for_completion() below for handling completion in atomic/interrupt context. @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ queue spinlock. Any such concurrent calls to complete() or complete_all() probably are a design bug. Signaling completion from hard-irq context is fine as it will appropriately -lock with spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore and it will never sleep. +lock with spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() and it will never sleep. try_wait_for_completion()/completion_done(): -- 2.45.2