From 9186a1f37d190f433c64558a4efeac7ed776b571 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xinming Hu Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:06:09 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] mwifiex: do not increase tx_pkts_queued if receive address tx paused If tx_pkts_queued is increased for tx paused receive address, tx process will be triggered for this packet. But since RA list was tx paused, there will be an infinite loop in mwifiex_wmm_process_tx waiting for the event(tx pause, tdls cs) to cancel tx pause. This will be an dead loop, since main_process was locked at this time, there will be no opportunity to process event. So do not increase tx_pkts_queued if receive address tx paused, this will be restored RA list is unpaused. Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil Signed-off-by: Cathy Luo Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo --- drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c index 8a4dd248ff01..8e343b3f60e9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c @@ -803,7 +803,10 @@ mwifiex_wmm_add_buf_txqueue(struct mwifiex_private *priv, atomic_set(&priv->wmm.highest_queued_prio, priv->tos_to_tid_inv[tid_down]); - atomic_inc(&priv->wmm.tx_pkts_queued); + if (ra_list->tx_paused) + priv->wmm.pkts_paused[tid_down]++; + else + atomic_inc(&priv->wmm.tx_pkts_queued); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->wmm.ra_list_spinlock, flags); } -- 2.45.2