From 96054569190bdec375fe824e48ca1f4e3b53dd36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:49:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86: don't send SIGBUS for kernel page faults It's wrong for several reasons, but the most direct one is that the fault may be for the stack accesses to set up a previous SIGBUS. When we have a kernel exception, the kernel exception handler does all the fixups, not some user-level signal handler. Even apart from the nested SIGBUS issue, it's also wrong to give out kernel fault addresses in the signal handler info block, or to send a SIGBUS when a system call already returns EFAULT. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index f62777940dfb..4c4508e8a204 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -802,8 +802,10 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address, up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); /* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die: */ - if (!(error_code & PF_USER)) + if (!(error_code & PF_USER)) { no_context(regs, error_code, address); + return; + } /* User-space => ok to do another page fault: */ if (is_prefetch(regs, error_code, address)) -- 2.45.2