From aea369b959bef10d235cd0714789cd8b0fe170b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:19:27 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] timers: Make internal_add_timer() update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0 The internal_add_timer() function updates base->next_timer only if timer->expires < base->next_timer. This is correct, but it also makes sense to do the same if we add the first non-deferrable timer. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Tested-by: Mike Galbraith --- kernel/timer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c index 0c638cf3d9d2..c0d8898fed98 100644 --- a/kernel/timer.c +++ b/kernel/timer.c @@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ static void internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer) * Update base->active_timers and base->next_timer */ if (!tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base)) { - if (time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer)) + if (!base->active_timers++ || + time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer)) base->next_timer = timer->expires; - base->active_timers++; } base->all_timers++; } -- 2.45.2