From b5149873a0c299195b5346fe4dc2c5b04ae2f995 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tal Shorer Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:29:24 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: respect isolated cpus when queueing an unbound work Initialize wq_unbound_cpumask to exclude cpus that were isolated by the cmdline's isolcpus parameter. Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/workqueue.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 64d0edf428f8..bfa433b38a61 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4980,6 +4980,10 @@ int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask) if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&saved_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; + /* + * Not excluding isolated cpus on purpose. + * If the user wishes to include them, we allow that. + */ cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) { apply_wqattrs_lock(); @@ -5579,7 +5583,7 @@ int __init workqueue_init_early(void) WARN_ON(__alignof__(struct pool_workqueue) < __alignof__(long long)); BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq_unbound_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)); - cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); + cpumask_andnot(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_isolated_map); pwq_cache = KMEM_CACHE(pool_workqueue, SLAB_PANIC); -- 2.45.2