From e04a01837729663572baf7164100e28265de7ed8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maor Gottlieb Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:59:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Consolidate flow rules regardless their flow tag Flow rules with same match criteria and value should be mapped to the same flow table entry regardless the flow tag identifier. Flow tag is part of flow table entry context and not of the destination, therefore we should return error when we try to add destination to flow table entry with different flow tag. Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c index 0ac7a2fc916c..2f4eb99a50fa 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c @@ -1232,10 +1232,18 @@ static struct mlx5_flow_handle *add_rule_fg(struct mlx5_flow_group *fg, fs_for_each_fte(fte, fg) { nested_lock_ref_node(&fte->node, FS_MUTEX_CHILD); if (compare_match_value(&fg->mask, match_value, &fte->val) && - (flow_act->action & fte->action) && - flow_act->flow_tag == fte->flow_tag) { + (flow_act->action & fte->action)) { int old_action = fte->action; + if (fte->flow_tag != flow_act->flow_tag) { + mlx5_core_warn(get_dev(&fte->node), + "FTE flow tag %u already exists with different flow tag %u\n", + fte->flow_tag, + flow_act->flow_tag); + handle = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST); + goto unlock_fte; + } + fte->action |= flow_act->action; handle = add_rule_fte(fte, fg, dest, dest_num, old_action != flow_act->action); -- 2.45.2